This sentence—“A true princess never claims to be a princess; only commoners daydream to live like a princess”—is superficially a humorous social observation, but its deeper implications provoke profound reflection on the complex relationship between identity, existence, and psychology. This article will explore the essence of identity, the conflict between the internal and external, and humanity's pursuit of an idealized life from philosophical and psychological perspectives.
Philosophical Aspect: The Essence of Identity and Existence
1. What is a “true princess”: The debate between essence and appearance
Philosopher Martin Heidegger's philosophy of existence posits that the core of human existence lies in “Dasein,” or how individuals manifest their existence in the world. From this perspective, a “true princess” does not need to declare her identity to the outside world, as her existence is already evident through her actions and demeanor. Her identity is a form of “authentic being,” not dependent on others' recognition or external labels.
Aristotle also distinguished between “essence and attributes”: a person's identity is not defined by the titles or adornments they possess, but by their inner virtues and actions. A princess does not say she is a princess because her self-awareness transcends the need for external validation. Her value lies not in “being seen” but in “becoming.”
2. The commoners' “daydream”: The pursuit of an idealized life
In contrast, the dream of commoners to “live like a princess” is a projection of “inauthentic being.” This can be seen as an escape from reality—they base their identity on imitation of others rather than genuine internal needs. This phenomenon is similar to Søren Kierkegaard's concept of the “despairing self”: when individuals fail to accept their true existence, they fill the void within through fantasy and imitation.
This also involves Jean-Paul Sartre's notion of “being-for-others.” The commoners' “daydream” indicates a mode of existence centered on the gaze of others—they seek to shape a fictitious identity recognized by the outside world, not for internal satisfaction. This stands in stark contrast to the inner fulfillment of the “true princess.”
Psychological Aspect: Self-awareness and the Idealized Self
1. The psychological need for identity: Self-esteem and self-worth
Psychologist Alfred Adler proposed that feelings of inferiority drive humans to pursue superiority. Commoners living like princesses can be understood as a desire for a high-value identity, aimed at overcoming feelings of inadequacy or environmental limitations. This psychological need is not entirely negative, as it can inspire individuals to seek a better life, but when this pursuit leans towards fantasy rather than action, it may lead to psychological frustration and emptiness.
2. The idealized self: Jung's “shadow” theory
Psychologist Carl Jung believed that everyone has an “ideal self,” which is a projection of the image we most wish to become. However, when the idealized self becomes excessively detached from reality, it generates a “shadow”—the repressed, unaccepted parts of the self.
Commoners fantasizing about becoming princesses may reflect a yearning for an idealized life, but it also reveals dissatisfaction with their current self. Their “princess dream” actually uncovers their inner shadow: an escape from reality and fear of inadequacy. Such psychological projection, if not properly addressed, may lead to a split in self-awareness and even emotional anxiety.
3. Self-affirmation and internal-external consistency
Research in psychology shows that true self-worth comes from self-congruence, which is the harmony between an individual's actions and inner beliefs. A true princess does not need to proclaim herself as a princess because her identity recognition aligns with her actions. In contrast, the “imitative princess life” of commoners may represent a discrepancy between external behavior and internal values.
Such a psychological state may lead to “cognitive dissonance,” where there is a contradiction between internal beliefs and external behaviors. The key to resolving this contradiction lies in accepting one's true identity and pursuing a lifestyle that aligns more closely with inner values, rather than merely imitating others' lives.
The Intersection of Philosophy and Psychology: The Pursuit of Authentic Living
The common focus of philosophy and psychology is to help humanity understand itself and find a more authentic way of living. The contrast between the true princess and commoners ultimately leads to a discussion about “how to live authentically”:
Enhancing self-awareness:
Philosopher Socrates emphasized “know thyself,” and psychology also highlights the importance of self-awareness. If commoners can recognize their inner value, they need not seek validation through imitation of others.
Accepting the imperfect self:
True happiness comes from accepting one's imperfections. Both philosophy and psychology assert that human growth lies in understanding one's limitations and uncovering potential from them.
Embracing true freedom:
Sartre advocated for “the responsibility of free choice,” meaning individuals should take responsibility for their existence rather than entrusting their identity to external expectations. Psychology reminds us that inner freedom is more important than external identity.
Conclusion: The Pursuit Beyond Identity
The core insight of “A true princess never claims to be a princess” is that true value comes from inner fulfillment, not from external proclamations or imitation. Philosophically, this is a quest for essence and existence; psychologically, it is an exploration of self-actualization. For everyone, transcending the superficiality of identity and pursuing a life consistent with the self may be the true path to happiness and fulfillment.